Return Entire thread Last 50 posts

[VIPPER] The Fake 1969 moon landing? [Conspiracy Theory]

36 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 00:38
>>4
U watched it through a telescope, or did you watch the transmission on TV?
37 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 03:24
>>1
Because I categorically KNOW it happened.
I was a Communications Engineering student (in England) at the time and we were tracking the comms using a steerable parabolic dish aerial, while simultaneously having access to the live tv broadcasts.

Most of the educated portion of the developed world was watching those live broadcasts and knew that they were seeing the greatest achievement in the history of mankind. A feat that has been repeated, but never bettered (apart from the Apollo 13 rescue perhaps).

You're a fucking deluded moron if you think the whole educated world could be duped by a faked landing.
38 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 06:12
>>19
It’s happened, but radiation / xrays fried all the photos and video.

Dr Van Allen himself explained how the Apollo Astronauts never dealt with the radiation of the Van Allen Belts. They slipped through the thinnest areas to avoid excessive radiation dosages.

The shit they have now as evidence are recreations to “prove” we went there. Kubrick directed it.

The new Japanese Lunar Orbiter that photographed the moon's surface over the last few years has photographed ALL of the lunar landing sites from various passes... showing the tracks, equipment and landers still sitting on the surface.

Kubrick was hired by NASA to produce media for them but he didn't have the ability, skills or technology to create anything realistic. Even 2001: A Space Odyssey was impressive for its time but entirely unconvincing. If you believe Kubrick faked the Apollo missions you are a mental retard. He was brought to the space center in Florida to consult with NASA artists while designing and researching his film. People assuming NASA hired Kubrick have no idea how impossible he was to work with.
39 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 08:58
>>1
Soviets won every aspect of the space race.
The americans had only one chance to prove themselves, that would have been landing on the moon. Since all their attempts miserably failed, they had to fake it, in that political climate admitting defeat was not an option.
They faked it and claimed victory, "Space race won" It was their pride on the line.
Guess what, soon as technology got close for other countries to really go there with remote operated devices, the US declared the landing site a NO GO Zone, like a 10 kilometers square and high cube space, reasoning this is a Heritage site of Humanitys greatest achievement, therefore it should not be disturbed, aka no one should go there and see that there is no flag or any tracks there.
You are welcome
40 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 11:45
>>31
You've got to be around 60 or older then. Why are you on 4ct?
41 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 14:32
>>1
https://i.imgur.com/4FSuN28.jpg
Why do you still believe the 1969 moon landing happened?

The Russians HATED America. Not once did they question the footage, missions, spacecraft or capabilities of the US Space program. Not once.
42 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 17:19
>>37
OK I know this is a larp
43 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 20:06
>>38
Literally said it happened. Of course the shit / equipment is still on the moon. However all the “photos” and “videos” shown are sketchy. Shit is out of place and lighting is all wonky. Why?

Is it so hard to believe cosmic radiation destroyed film on the moon?
44 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9306 22:53
>>40
You've got to be around 16 or younger. Why are you on 4ct?
45 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 01:40
>>43
Shit is out of place and lighting is all wonky. Why?
So you don't have any actual proof. It just looks "wonky." That's not an argument you moron.
Is it so hard to believe cosmic radiation destroyed film on the moon?
Yes. Prove that it did or you concede the point.
46 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 04:27
>>1
Because 69lolamirite
47 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 07:14
>>1
https://i.imgur.com/O5jrQQF.jpg
it wasn't faked per se but nasa fucked up the calculations and they landed on enceladus and told everyone it was our moon to save face

the soviets went along with the lie because landing on enceladus is more of a technological feat
48 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 10:01
>>47
You can't "accidentally" land on a completely different celestial body. Christ that's retarded.
49 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 12:48
hmm 69, I am not sure, but those mirrors are hard to fake
50 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 15:35
>>1
Literally look at the pic you stupid fuck. Why is everything lit perfectly in a vacuum >>23
51 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 18:22
>>48
1969 had better tech than you probably realize
52 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 21:09
>>16
Lurk moar newfag
53 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9307 23:57
>>45
Polaroid in xray room would kill the film. Imagine on moon no atmosphere. Don’t need over 100 IQ to figure this out.
54 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9308 02:44
>>1
Occam's razor, retard
55 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9308 05:30
>>1
Yes.
All the deniers have repeatedly shown to have no knowledge in orbital mechanics, rocket technology, radiation. It would actually cost more with the technology back then to fake it than actually go there.
56 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9308 08:17
>>51
That doesn't explain anything. If you fucked up the pre-planning, that's hundreds of people who all unanimously mistook the moon for some random jupiter moon. If it was a miss on account of being miscalculated, you'd just drift into space forever. You seem to misunderstand how impossible it would actually be to go several planets over AND back.
57 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9308 13:51
>>32
Based answer, anon, some people really don't realize just how impossible it'd be to fake
58 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9308 22:11
>>48
He is trolling VIPPER.
59 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9309 09:18
>>1
American education breeding retards like OP
60 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9309 20:25
>>1
can you prove it didnt?
61 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9310 07:33
>>6
Confirmed brainlet
62 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9310 18:39
>>48
You can, I did it once. Did a sweet jump on my BMX and miscalculated the landing and landed on Titan. Still got laid though.
63 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9311 05:46
why are all conspiracy theorists and flatearthers of lower education and bad at the sciences?
64 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9311 16:53
>>1
Let's say it didn't, what would it change to my life? I've been told it happened,
I'm rolling with it because I genuinely don't fucking care.
65 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9312 04:00
9/11 happened just as it was shown on TV.
Right?
66 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9312 15:08
>>43

https://i.imgur.com/ZYWeW1A.png

Is it so hard to believe cosmic radiation destroyed film on the moon?

Fucking moron.
67 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9313 02:15
It's just not that hard compared to the technology available. Making it into space at all was the harder challenge and we cheated at that by stealing a Russian satellite and reusing Nazi scientists. Well, lol okay, white people's accomplishment, but pretty much all the factions.

Hey kids, did you know the motivation for colonialism wasn't racism, but Christian resistance to Catholic aggression? That's right kids, you just got caught in our sectarian crossfire, you're not even that important. Spain was raking it in with New Spain and everyone else had to figure out something similar or be very violently forced to be Catholic. Like putting you on a rack and burning you with hot irons violent. Fucking Catholics.
68 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9313 13:22
>>60
Can you prove colorful unicorns doesnt exist?
69 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9314 00:28
>>68
has one ever been documented in non fiction?
70 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9314 11:35
>>69
The universe is huge you know.
71 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9315 09:42
>>11
Elon Musk believes it happened. Or is he a fucking idiot as well?

https://time.com/5628572/elon-musk-moon-landing/
72 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9323 12:18
>>70
are you implying the universe is so infinite that a fucking colourfull unicorn is probable?
73 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9366 19:11
>>56
https://i.imgur.com/YGSrnMX.jpg
enceladus is exactly 4.83 times the mass of the sun so if you miss, the gravity of enceladus draws you to it like vacuum

don't be retarded what do you think happened to spacelab
74 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9616 19:12
>>11
50 years of technological advancement
And still a trip to mars is a 1 way ticket. Sure we could have been there a long time ago, but humanity decided to put resources into other stuff, like new phones, wars, oil and a whole bunch of other useless shit.
rover on mars but no rover on the moon?
Why send a rover worth billions onto moon when you have already gathered soil sampled by hand? Thats like buying a helicopter to go get snacks from the gas station.
75 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9744 02:45
>>71
He's kind of like Screech on Saved by the Bell. Yeah he's smart but the severe autism cancels out any accomplishments he makes.

rip in peace Dustin Rutilatedquartz (Diamond was his stage name)
76 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9871 10:19
>>62
What are the chicks like on Titan? Do they regularly put out to Earth boys?
77 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9894 13:52
>>73
enceladus is exactly 4.83 times the mass of the sun
Mass of enceladus = 1,08 × 10^20 kg
Mass of the Sun = 1,9891×10^30 kg
What the fuck you been smoking?
78 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9917 17:26
>>74
Why send a rover worth billions onto moon
lets just throw them at israel
79 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-9940 20:59
80 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10026 12:33
>>32
This. It always amazes me how highly conspiracy theorists (QAnon being the latest) think of the government and the elite's competence.

If you stop and think about the "stopthesteal" claims, even for a second, for example, they fall apart. Democrats are capable enough to falsify ballots/hack into Dominion software (pick your own theory) to get Biden elected, but their Congressional candidates lost on the same ballots?
81 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10027 16:20
>>77
https://i.imgur.com/ak8vI1f.png
NASA doesn't use kilograms. you made a mistake in your conversion somewhere pic related
82 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10029 23:54
>>81
I took it from Wikipedia, i couldnt really give a fuck about the exact amounts, its never going to affect my life, my point was that a moon is not 4.83 times the mass of the sun.
83 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10032 07:28
>>77
thank you
84 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10033 11:17
We went to the moon alright. Stanley Kubrick took us there. He was involved with nasa, and he left a lot of messages within the Shining that he faked the footage and found it hard to live with for the rest of his life.
85 Name: VIPPER 1993-09-10081 18:27
Space is flat.

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Name:
Leave this field blank: