Can someone explain this to me?

1 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 01:34
You understand that in Nazi Germany, The Soviet Union, China etc the people who tooke away guns/ liberties are the police right? How can you say you stand for small government but what to increase it's power?
2 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 02:03
based anon is based
3 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 02:53
I like small government but I also like police executing innocent blacks in the streets
4 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 03:27
sorry your brain can't see the grey
5 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 04:01
6 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 04:34
I too like conflating unrelated issues to confuse reality to push communism
7 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 05:08
I've changed my mind on wanting a small government. I want a big government run by whites now.
8 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 05:41
there are people who do not see the how bad giving government all the power while stripping the people of their only way to defend themselves for the sake of security. they do not comprehend that the government was a necessary evil rather then a marvelous introduction.
9 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 06:15
I don't think people put that much thought into it. As soon as a dem takes over they'll start saying that the dems corrupted the police and turned them against us.
10 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 07:05
How come liberals want to take away my freedoms but also want to defund the police? Who the hell is going to arrest me for my hate crimes?
11 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 07:39
Enlighten me.
12 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 08:12
Rule of law - laws are written down, with clear conditions and consequences, and are enforced fairly across the population.

Small government - laws are few, and limited in scope.

These are unrelated issues. However, it makes sense that if you are to have a few rules on important matters, you would want them enforced fairly, and it would be an honorable and respectable job to be the agent of the state doing the enforcing.
13 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 08:46
I already have
14 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 09:20
What freedoms do liberals want to take away?
15 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 09:53
16 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 10:27
I know what rule of law is. My point is this, if you give government more power it can use that power to oppress you. Conservatives seems to think the police aren't a part of that oppression when in every authoritarian regime they're at the center of it.
17 Name: SuperFratBoyExtreme 2020-09-01 11:00
you you dumb dumb
18 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 11:34
Real Liberty loving Americans get what you're pointing out. That bullshit is for the average dumbfuck fat assed dipshit fuckhead who has no fucking idea about things like philosophy, Faith, dignity or the ultimate arguments of collectivism vs. Individualism.. Much less the Founding Father's thoughts beliefs and ideas in those regards. No. Bitches who sport that setup are the pogue fucks that think Zero Dark Thirty is an operations guide and that the fuckhead Kyle Bass is anything other than a Blue Falcon faggot.. Which BTW, looking at operators like that cuck bitch Bass, gun grabber Crenshaw and that leftist cuck Nick from Ranger up tells me that nothing but left leaning fucksticks went into the SOF community after around 2003. So assuming the elite will side with the Constitution if shit goes sideways is a very dangerous assumption.. I wouldn't trust any operators under the age of 40.
19 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 12:07
Nailed it.
20 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 12:41
Because in order for peaceful day to day life continue it's not enough to just have a set of rules they have to have teeth behind them. Can you comprehend how many people would be preyed upon were it not for the fact that as soon as they try, thousands of men with guns will coordinate with eachother to capture or kill that person? I like being able to walk down the street to the store and for the 99.98% of the people who would prey upon me in a setting of lawlessness be too afraid of the consequences.

There is no such thing as a vacuum of authority. Without police, you would be answering to another emergent force. And so would I so you explain something to me now; why should I not consider the people trying to abolish the police an immediate threat to my life and deal with them accordingly?
21 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 13:14
22 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 13:48
Right now, every motherfucker has a gun and they're still being oppressed, so your entire argument is a straw man. Most are just too stupid and poor to know better. Add on a bit of fear, and you've got yourself an armed pathetic right-wing coward. About 1/3 of the US right now.
23 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 14:21
Fuck off cuck. An armed population would achieve that far better than a centralized authority that cannot be everywhere or will eventually develop anterior objectives like the police. The population will ALWAYS be interested in looking out for the population. Police get corrupted, ALWAYS.
24 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 14:55
Those who need permission to defend Life and Liberty do not deserve and will never have either.
25 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 15:28
Guns you retárd
26 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 16:19
Found the butthurt cubicle fuck sweating it out in their Booze Allen Hamilton internship at some backwater subcontractor. Less than .02% of you dillweeds ever make it to the office.
27 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 17:09
KEK! Shut it down, the goyim know..
28 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 17:59
You mean by passing assault weapon bans introduced by republicans and continued by republican presidents after them?
29 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 18:33
No one thinks we should live in total anarchy but having a paramilitary police force gives government the tools to strip away your liberties with ease.
30 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 19:06
Go play warlords in Africa where they have an armed population and no centralized authority you stupid nigger.
31 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 19:56
The population will ALWAYS be interested in looking out for the population.
That's simply not true.
32 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 20:30
I'm with you brother. The elites will do whatever best lines their pockets. It's up to citizens to make sure the constitution is upheld.
33 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 21:03
Fuck off and die you contract whore. You fucks humped the bunk and your bosses miscalculated where it really counts. That's what happens when nothing but stupid people are the shotcallers. There's no way to fix what you stupid kids broke now. Good. It was past time anyways.
34 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 21:21
All of this does not matter in the least.
Like the one guy said, there is no such thing as a power vacuum.
Either there is a givernment with a police force, a warlord (King) with his guard, or there are smaller tribes all warring with each other.
These are your options.
35 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 21:38
I trust the police as much as I do niggers and leftists. If they all kill each other, actual humans will be better off.
36 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 21:55
All evidence supports my statement. To the point that the cartels give a simple statement to all police in any area they intend to operate: Plata o plomo, silver or lead. That lays it all out about the reality of police everywhere on planet Earth. The police are corrupt, the population looks out for its interests. Even if the population is corrupt and folks get bought out, the second the deal doesn't work for the population, they'll turn on whoever in a heartbeat. Police will stick it out past any point of reason. Now, answer to that with something better than a bitch ass kid level denial.
37 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 22:12
You can say "contract whore", you can say they fucked up. But you alternative is playing warlords. Ask Africa how fun it is.
38 Name: Anonymous 2020-09-01 22:29
There's a middle ground between Authoritarianism and the state of nature. Having cops larping around like some shit out of modern warfare is an infringement ok civil liberties.

Leave this field blank: