Return

why don't people give more of a shit about article 13?

1 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 03:08
it's fucking serious. people shrug it off like it's nothing. there are people that haven't even heard about it. why aren't more people outraged by it?
2 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 04:52
They don't care til it touches 4ct.
3 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 07:39
Because it is a European Union issue. Not a United States issue. So let whatever happens there happen, it's their own fault for dissolving their own respective countries' sovereignty.
4 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 10:26
>>2
that's fucking retarded.
5 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 13:13
>>3
you already lost net neutrality. if this gets passed it's only a matter of time before it gets passed in the united states.
6 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 16:00
Bcz I'm not a europoor and seeing europoors suffer is both hilarious and fuels my american ego.
7 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 18:47
>>4
why
8 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-17 21:34
>>7
article 13 affects the entire internet including 4ct.
9 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 00:21
>>5
Ppl who support net neutrality are filthy commies who want the government to control the internet. The fact that net neutrality is gone means the government has lost power controlling the internet, meaning something like article 13 is less likely to happen.
10 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 17:01
>>9
but it gives huge companies/ conglomerates more leniency to exploit the internet for money.
11 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 05:54
>>5
it's only a matter of time before it gets passed in the united states
No?
12 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 08:41
>>10
Yeah, that's how capitalism works. Good job buddy!
13 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 11:28
>>12
how is that any better than the internet being controlled by the government then? they still both exploit the internet for selfish reasons.
14 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 14:15
>>11
why not?
15 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 17:02
>>13
Government censors. Corporations could censor, but u always have the option of switching providers if the one you have pisses you off. If enough people stop paying, they'd have to change their ways to not lose any money, or go banckrupt and close down. Either way, u have more options and freedom when the government stays the fuck out.
16 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 19:49
>>15
what would stop every company from censoring the internet then? if they could do that why wouldn't they? there wouldn't be any provider to turn to.companies are just as greedy and money hungry as the government.
17 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 22:36
>>1
Test
18 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 01:23
>>16
Bcz ppl would get pissed off and boycott the internet all together. Remember, u need to speak with your wallet. Companies aren't dumb. If they see ppl getting pissed at censorship and ppl stop throwing them money, they'll have no choice but to remove their policies. And if they don't, some other fag will attempt to open up a "free speech internet" company.
19 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 04:09
>>1
because trump issued in the post-truth world and no one sincerely advocates for anything any more. no one actually wants their mind changed for the better either.
20 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 06:56
>>18
people need to use the internet. it's necessity in society. you can't expect people to live with out the internet in this day and age. maybe a small group of people would follow this alternative provider but it wouldn't last. these big companies already have a monopoly on the market and a small alternative companies wouldn't be able to compete. like youtube and vidme.
21 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 09:43
>>20
There's countless of small email providers that support privacy. Duckduckgo keeps getting new users thx 2 the google privacy breaches. All I'm saying is, ppl care about free speech enough 2 fight 4 it. Besides, companies censoring the internet literally does not benefit them in the slightest. And, as long as websites exist, regardless of censorship, there will always be a way 2 access those websites. Whether with TOR or a VPN.
22 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 12:30
>>21
yur not getting to a truly censored website, period. tor, vpn and/or god aint gonna help.
23 Name: Anonymous 2019-01-19 20:52
>>21
yeah. i guess you're right. i think people should definitely take article 13 more seriously though.

Return
Name:
Leave this field blank: