Return

26 Lancet scientists who trashed theory have links to Wuhan.

1 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 12:50
REVEALED: 26 out of the 27 Lancet scientists who trashed theory that Covid leaked from a Chinese lab have links to Wuhan researchers

• The Lancet letter published in March 2020 called claims that Covid-19 originated in lab 'conspiracy theories'

• It was signed by 27 scientists from across the globe working in virology and other medical science fields

• The widely-read letter effectively ended all debate about origins of the global coronavirus pandemic

• Investigation by The Telegraph has found 26 out of 27 had connections to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9980015/26-Lancet-scientists-trashed-theory-Covid-leaked-Chinese-lab-links-Wuhan.html
2 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 13:33
>>1

So? We have learned nothing more about Wuhan or the lab since over a year ago when I first read on 4ct that there was a corona virus lab in wuhan and only 2 of its kind in China. This was always going to be a shit show. You can't force researchers to commit career suicide.
3 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 14:23
>>1
It obviously came from that lab gain of function. How do you think these new vaccines are working if the way they act isn't gain of function?
4 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 14:57
>>3
gain of function and covid vaccines have little to nothing to do with each other.

Not saying it didnt come from the lab, but the virus uses some protein that make it really hard to do any lab work with, and the ones they said were the modifications that made it pandemic worthy are completely natural, and also not the ones you would pick if you wanted to do gain of function research.

Again, thats not discounting its from a lab, but there surely is no proof or clues in the viral dna, all the proof needs to come from on-site investigations. Too bad china is actively fucking with that. (and tbh, thats the biggest clue something is up, all the rest is hearsay and tinfoil hat drivel)
5 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 15:30
>>4
there surely is no proof or clues in the viral dna,

Thats not true anon, there are FER inclusion sites that restriction enzymes digest DNA at, and are therefore very useful for making recombinant plasmids, and TLDR there some in exactly the right place in the original Covid-19 sequence, and the probability of it being there by chance (particularly since the virus has since evolved-out all of these sequences) is low as chinese standards of morality
6 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 16:04
>>1
Investigation by The Telegraph has found 26 out of 27 had connections to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology
Link?
7 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 16:38
>>5
Evidence for this claim?
8 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 17:11
>>2
and
>>5
were both (me), calm down
9 Name: Anonymous 2021-09-11 17:28
>>7

A distinguishing feature of SARS‑CoV‑2 is its incorporation of a polybasic site cleaved by furin,[59] which appears to be an important element enhancing its virulence.[87] In SARS-CoV-2 the recognition site is formed by the incorporated 12 codon nucleotide sequence CCT CGG CGG GCA which corresponds to the amino acid sequence PRRA.[88] This sequence is upstream of an arginine and serine which forms the S1/S2 cleavage site (PRRARS) of the spike protein.[89] Although such sites are a common naturally-occurring feature of other viruses within the Subfamily Orthocoronavirinae,[88] it appears in few other viruses from the Beta-CoV genus,[90] and it is unique among members of its subgenus for such a site.[59] SARS-CoV-1 is an example of a well known relative of SARS-CoV-2 that lacks a FCS.

wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigations_into_the_origin_of_COVID-19#Phylogenetics_and_taxonomy)
10 Name: SFBEkills 2021-09-11 17:46
>>1
REVEALED: YOU are a stupid, lying asshole.
Fuck off and DIE shithead.
No one believes your sad LIES.

Return
Name:
Leave this field blank: