Return Entire thread

Fuck TESLA.

2 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-05 05:14
>>1
Fuck off

Hydrogen is the last desperate try to keep the fuel oligopoly.
3 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-05 06:21
>>1
At which pressure do you contain the hydrogen in those cars?

Energy density per volume? Per weight?
7 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-05 14:59
>>1
Oh a faggot actually clicked the hydrogen ad on the side of the page and bought those stocks?

There's advantages and disadvantages of it. The only exception to battery powered new technology vehicles that are produced in Germany are certain buses and some trucks.

Sorry, but those people sold you shitty stocks unless you're willing to hold for the next 20-30 years.
8 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-05 15:15
>>1
these cars are still electric you dumbass, they just use hydrogen fuel cells to power the electric motors instead of stupid tesla bateries
9 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-05 15:32
>>1
Someone wants to buy TESLA stock cheap?

I have an electric car that I can charge for free in my garage from the solar panel on my roof. Cool and cheap. No fucking going to the station to collect fuel or hydrogen.

Both will coexist nicely for some time.
28 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-07 07:05
>>1
LoL. EVs arent going anywhere. And 10 billion is a drop in the bucket.

Have fun finding a hydrogen fueling station anywhere outside of LA or Hamberg.

"As of today, there are 90 H2 filling stations in Germany." Kek. 90.

https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/germany-90th-hydrogen-station-opens/
29 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-07 08:29
>>1
Trying to lower the price of Tesla so you can buy more stocks

There's barely any source of hydrogen in nature. Only way you can get enough hydrogen is if you split water molecules, which requires electricity. You'll lose more power in the process compared to just storing it on a battery
31 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-07 12:39
>>1
Takes more power to create th hydrogen used in those cars than it does to manufacture and drive an electric car. You fell for a energy net negative meme, and you should feel bad
32 Name: Anonymous 2021-06-07 16:50
>>1
The cap on progression of the technology is too low for long term investing.
Electricity is still superior, its the method of transfer that's hindered and will be resolved with arrival of solid state batteries.
If 100% is full capability of the tech then hydro is at 80% whereas electricity is at 30%.
Makes much more sense to develop a 30% efficient tech to 100% long term than it is to develop an 80% tech to 100% for short term gains.

Return Entire thread
Name:
Leave this field blank: