Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Pages: 1-100 101-200 201-300 301-

My plan is to make one new thread a day (Part 2)

296 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 17:11
>>295
They will only come back later.
297 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 18:38
>>296
With even bigger numbers.
298 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 19:16
>>1
I am writing an essay on sexism on the internet. Sexism is particularly rampant in here since female posters are asked to show their tits. I'm a female and won't show my tits. But i'm gonna use the replies i get and put them in my essay to prove the point.
299 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 20:24
>>298
If you're trying to make a point you shouldn't specifically ask for sexist replies. so your argument is invalid.

Might I suggest you try sucking your teachers' cock? At least that way it you will have to put in some effort in order to get results.
300 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 20:58
So, you serious about not showing your tits or are you just messing with us? But that would be just cruel.
301 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 21:32
>>1
Women are twice more likely to attempt suicide compared to men. Men are almost three times more likely to succeed in their suicide attempt than a female.

Why are women such fucking failures?
302 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 22:21
>>1
Is it really free speech? That's what i hate about 4ct, it should change it's model so we are all truly anonymous.

I could call you a fat autistic nigger and that all aspies should he shot on site, but as soon as I joke about blowing up buildings or requesting or posting certain content then you are denied free speech and have to go to the rape house.

Tl:dr free speech can't exist if you can't post or say what you want without it being enforced as a criminal offense. Then again, maybe i am overthinking it posting as words aren't speech but it's still impacts what you can and can't do.
303 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-08 22:39
>>1
I don't really get the insane amount of people that think Emma Watson is ludicrously attractive. Like she's cute sure, but she's not insanely hot. She looks like a ton of other cute girls I went to high school and college with, nothing special and her politics don't help.
304 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 07:05
>>302
That's what i hate about 4ct, it should change it's model so we are all truly anonymous.

Fuck off Bob, this site is anonymous.
305 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 09:39
>>1
Why did we stop after only two atomic bombs? We showed the world what we were capable of. We kept them as a threat but they would've feared us more when they know that we don't lie
306 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 16:19
>>305
You only need 2 to make them perverts. We should atom bomb ourselves twice as well.
307 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 17:43
>>305
it took a huge effort just to build the two that worked. by the time the US had any kind of first strike capacity, the Russians had a few of their own, and it was judged not worth the risk.

by most.
308 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 19:06
>>306
No we should've taken out all of our enemies and been conquerors
309 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 20:47
>>305
We destroyed 2 cities in a matter of minutes. I think that was more than enough for the whole world to get the picture
310 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 22:10
>>305
Patton wanted to use them on the soviets to win the war against communism before it began, but after the second world war ended, we were just so damn tired of fighting and wanted to be left alone. It would have been much harder for president Truman to justify using nuclear weapons against the Russians, given their instrumental role in the defeat of the Nazis. Personally, I think Patton was right: If communism had been stopped and American imperium established immediately after the war, many lives would have been saved in the long run. We wouldn't have seen Mao or Stalin kill tens of millions. But we were tired from war and just wanted to go home and fuck. Then other people had the bomb, and if you don't have a monopoly on the bomb, using it has much bigger consequences.
Still, we totally should have. I think Truman would have if he had known the future crimes of communism, and that the Russians were so close themselves to developing one.
311 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 22:44
>>307
But why even keep making them then? We had the best toy on the block and all the other kids were scared. One would've been enough drop one on russia and everyone else would've bent the knee immediately
312 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 23:17
>>311
We didn't know how big a foe Russia was going to be. Hindsight is 20/20.
313 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 00:08
>>309
Apparently not. Just a few short years later the cold war started. We could've and should've done more
314 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 00:58
>>310
Tired of fighting? With the bomb we wouldn't needs boots on the ground
315 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 04:01
>>311
One would've been enough drop one on russia

do you not comprehend how big Russia is, in terms of territory? you'd need hundreds of nukes to cover all the important spots, and besides, the aim wasn't world domination: the aim was control of your own nation through fear of an external enemy. no enemy - no fear.
316 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 04:52
>>314
one of the problems with nuclear weapons is they can't be set to only kill soldiers. a big criticism of the two nukes used on Japan was that they killed mainly civilians, and despite what the armchair warriors in here think, that was viewed as borderline war crime.

robotic drones are the way to go.
317 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 05:59
>>314
You must remember that massive U.S. and soviet forces were concentrated in Berlin at the time. The japanese didn't surrender after the first bomb. Russia may not have either: given their massive size, it may have taken four or five bombs. In the interim of days or weeks, there quite likely would have been brutal ground war.
>>316
The premise of this thread is that if you're the only one with bombs, whether or not you're a war criminal is negligible.
318 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 07:06
>>315
Yeah but the capital had the leaders. Without leaders the people wouldn't know what to do they would be to scared
319 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 08:46
>>315
Hit Moscow and Stalingrad.No surrender? Hit St. Petersburg and Novokuznetsk. Continue until surrender. It'll come quick.
320 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 10:10
>>317
But after they saw what happened in japan they wouldn't know that we only had 2. They would think we had a non stop arsenal
321 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 13:13
>>320
We didn't only have two. We had created more, and could have created many more pretty quickly. Nevertheless, they likely wouldn't have surrendered immediately. Once again, I cite the Japs.
322 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 16:17
The story of Pearl Harbor, and the resulting events are pretty bad. Not a great moment.

But hooollllyyyy fuck. That was like going squirrel hunting with a grenade launcher. They attacked a HARBOR and part of adjoining area.

WE COMPLETELY DESTROYED TWO ENTIRE, FULLY POPULATED CITIES.

nice
323 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 17:42
>>322
It was justified. Smart people don't throw rocks at people with missile launchers.
324 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 18:15
>>322
We may have over reacted a little bit but fuck them they started it
325 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-10 18:49
>>321
They we bomb them until they do. No need for boots on the ground still we just bomb them into submission
326 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-11 18:33
>>1
Why do people still smoke? It's a disgusting, expensive, addicting, habit that increases your chances of cancer along with a host of other bad shit.
327 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-11 20:03
>>1
whats with all these beta cuck from cuckfinger coming here?
328 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-11 20:25
>>1
I'm planning on killing myself. What kind of gun should I use and where do I get it? Fuck the world.
329 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-11 23:59
>>328
Ak47 sounds good.
330 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 07:02
>>329
It does.
331 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 16:44
>>330
What does.
332 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 17:31
>>1
Stan Lee will he cameo at his own funeral?
333 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 18:22
>>332
I think, yes...
334 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 18:56
>>332
It'd be fucking gold if he hologrammed himself into his own funeral
335 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 19:30
>>332
So are we going to have cgi cameos now or what
336 Name: SuperFratBoyExtreme 2018-11-12 19:47
Why do you care ?
Breaking news
95 year old dead
And you're surprised?
337 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 19:53
>>335
They filmed all of his cameos beforehand.
338 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 20:22
>>337
The only confirmed upcoming movies that have been worked on so far (that have promotional material at least) are Captain Marvel, Spider-Man: Far From Home and Avengers 4, so those were most likely his last 3 cameos
339 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 20:32
>>1
Why is the internet crap?
I keep coming back, for something the internet once had
Now it's gone, whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
340 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 20:42
>>1
What’s the most believable conspiracy theory out there?
341 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-12 21:01
>>340
How am I supposed to remember something like that?
342 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-13 07:01
>>1
How do I make an butthurt thread like this?
343 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-13 15:24
>>1
Make Apu into anti-left meme
Im sick of them infesting stuff just because they hate fun
344 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-13 23:45
>>343
Let's claim we wanted Apu gone to make the animated cast more White. We want to get rid of Carl next, so let's claim having a white guy doing the voice of a black guy is somehow racist or whatever
345 Name: [email protected] 2018-11-14 20:11
>>1
How do white Americans feel about becoming a minority soon. whites in America are around 52% whats your thoughts?

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts 1-100
Name:
Leave this field blank: