Last 50 posts
My plan is to make one new thread a day (Part 2)
Sharia Law is just law according to the Koran. Thing is, what a lot of white people don't realize, that "Sharia Law" isn't always 100% full blown stoning, acid, burkas, goatfucking and whatever else people like you think when they hear the term.
Traditional theory of Islamic jurisprudence recognizes several sources of sharia: the Quran, sunnah (authentic hadith), qiyas (analogical reasoning), and ijma (juridical consensus). Different legal schools—of which the most prominent are Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali and Jafari—developed methodologies for deriving sharia rulings from scriptural sources using a process known as ijtihad. Traditional jurisprudence distinguishes two principal branches of law, ʿibādāt (rituals) and muʿāmalāt (social relations), which together comprise a wide range of topics. Its rulings assign actions to one of five categories: mandatory, recommended, neutral, abhorred, and prohibited. Thus, some areas of sharia overlap with the Western notion of law while others correspond more broadly to living life in accordance with God’s will.
Hell, those that live in civilized countries and said they still want sharia law were almost always referring to implementing it in cases of civil arbitration, wedding, divorce, and funerary legal matters. Jewish and Christian communities in those western countries almost all have methods of pursing such personal/familial matters as per their faith. When the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales was talking about implementing some level of Sharia that's what he was talking about, purely civil matters that cannot and would not apply to non muslims, just like the jews and their rabbinical courts and the christians with their ecclesiastical courts.
Last 50 posts
Leave this field blank: