Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Pages: 1-100 101-200 201-300 301-400 401-500 501-600 601-700 701-

My plan is to make one new thread a day (Part 2)

306 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 17:19
>>305
You only need 2 to make them perverts. We should atom bomb ourselves twice as well.
307 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 18:43
>>305
it took a huge effort just to build the two that worked. by the time the US had any kind of first strike capacity, the Russians had a few of their own, and it was judged not worth the risk.

by most.
309 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 21:47
>>305
We destroyed 2 cities in a matter of minutes. I think that was more than enough for the whole world to get the picture
310 Name: Anonymous 2018-11-09 23:10
>>305
Patton wanted to use them on the soviets to win the war against communism before it began, but after the second world war ended, we were just so damn tired of fighting and wanted to be left alone. It would have been much harder for president Truman to justify using nuclear weapons against the Russians, given their instrumental role in the defeat of the Nazis. Personally, I think Patton was right: If communism had been stopped and American imperium established immediately after the war, many lives would have been saved in the long run. We wouldn't have seen Mao or Stalin kill tens of millions. But we were tired from war and just wanted to go home and fuck. Then other people had the bomb, and if you don't have a monopoly on the bomb, using it has much bigger consequences.
Still, we totally should have. I think Truman would have if he had known the future crimes of communism, and that the Russians were so close themselves to developing one.

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts 1-100
Name:
Leave this field blank: